CARGOHOLIDAYS, RESULTAT DE RECHERCHE MARQUEURS

VOS TAGS EN IMPORTATION DE MOTO ANGLAISE

Tag Archives: superjet

Embraer LINEAGE 1000E Private Jet Charter EMBRAER LINEAGE 1000E PRIVATE JET HIRE EMBRAER PRIVATE CHARTER MLKJETS14 - Unmatched Charter Vedanta Ambulance Service From Ranchi to Delhi

[ad_1]

If you are in a situation where you need an Ambulance to give your loved one advanced medical services, then you are free to contact our one of the fastest air ambulance service provider that is Vedanta Air Ambulance Service.

Our Company provides direct Private Charter or Commercial Airlines from your city to the desired city without any non-convenience. This Air Ambulance service is also offering both types of Aircraft like Private Charter Air Ambulance Services (King C-90, Pilatus, and Beach Craft-200) and Commercial Airlines (GO Air, Air India, Air Asia, Spice Jet, Indigo and other Airlines) with effective cost. This company is considered and listed in India’s top and complicated service provider of ambulance Ranchi only because of our superior service and hi-tech medical facility that make very easy to transport any critical patient.

Our therapeutic group handle all crucial treatment easily

We have lots of opportunities to provide private air ambulance services options further commercials airlines medical facilities within the very standard time duration. Since on the instance of emergency time, the people look for their quickest option devoid of thinking any money expansion but our company show the definite path and assist them by taking their all errands to shift their destinations. It has no extra or hidden booking fare and the mode of air call booking facilities is very simple and easy through online and offline or as per guidelines. It makes sure of the serious patients by providing the entire set of all emergency equipment’s such as- hi-tech ventilator, cardiac monitor, suction machine, nebulizer machine, pacemakers, infusion pump, defibrillator, oxygen cylinders both portable and jumbo in sizes and all the basic and advance life rescuing stocks from one city to another city.

This Air Ambulance has One after One the Best Features Those Are Below:-

  • Bed to bed fashionable way medical transposition from one city to another city
  • The practised all health check dispatchers team members
  • Full-Time MD doctors’ prop up with all medical accessories from one bed to another bed
  • Inexpensive and under budget booking cost without any hidden charges
  • 24/7 Hours all the time served in the same way ease of use on phone from anywhere

Scoop Stretcher Bed to Bed Emergency Facilities attract the people

This Air Ambulance Service in Ranchi come in no one position for their advanced facilities provide transparent economical cost, the unhidden fare for all patients. We are available any time to help patient and secure their life. Our company from Ranchi is also offering services with the entire and most advanced Medical setups and equipment anywhere in India and worldwide.

Reliable Emergency Medical Evacuation at Time

This Air Ambulance Service in Raipur has a very transparent mission to shift the patient anywhere in India with Fully featured Medical Air Ambulance Services with full responsibility and superb caring. We demand the real cost without any additional costing to provide totally bed to bed the best quality reliable service management team unit.

[ad_2]

Source by Ranjeet Kumar

Categories : DESTINATIONS, EMBRAER, FALCON, GULFSTREAM, HAWKER, JET NEWS, LARGE SIZE BODY JETS, LIGHT SIZE BODY JETS, MEDIUM SIZE BODY JETS, PRIVATE JET AFRICA, PRIVATE JET ASIA, PRIVATE JET AUSTRALIA, PRIVATE JET AVIONICS, PRIVATE JET BUILDER, PRIVATE JET CHARTER, PRIVATE JET CHATER, PRIVATE JET EUROPE, PRIVATE JET MAINTENANCE, PRIVATE JET MIDDLE EAST, PRIVATE JET SOUTH AMERICA, PRIVATE JET TIPS, PRIVATE JET USA, PRIVATE JETS DEALS, TRANSATLANTIC, TRANSPACIFIC
Posted by narrapresley
, , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments Off on Unmatched Charter Vedanta Ambulance Service From Ranchi to Delhi
The best destinations of private jet charter for charter a jet on 20203 - Why Buy a Cessna 175 Skylark Light Airplane?

[ad_1]

The Cessna 175 Skylark offers an affordable, reliable route to private plane ownership and good examples can be picked up at prices no more than the average family saloon car. You do not often come across these sturdy light aircraft yet they are one of the models in the Cessna line up that truly has stood the test of time.

The Cessna 175 Skylark is a four-seat, single- engine, high-wing airplane that was produced between 1958 and 1962 by the Cessna Aircraft Company. It was designed to fill a niche between the lower powered Cessna 172 Skyhawk and the heavy-duty Cessna 180 and 182 Skylane. Skylark was the name given to the deluxe versions of the 175 from 59-62. The basic airplane was sold as a 175. The Skylark C175B included a package of optional equipment and a special paint scheme.

Through its lifetime the basic airframe design changed once, from the straight cowl, straight tail to the hump nosed cowl and slanted tail of the later models. The fastback fuselage was retained through the entire production line.

Externally, the only obvious difference between the 172 and the 175 is the slight hump on the engine cowl behind the 82″ propeller. The hump allows for the bigger, geared GO-300 Continental engine that provides the 175 with extra horsepower and a beefier performance.

The engine of the C175 was rated at 175 hp (130 kW), or 30 hp (22 kW) more than the engine of the 172. The Skylark, with 175 horsepower, is 15 mph faster than a Skyhawk and can take off and land in shorter distances. The extra horsepower and manual flap activation on the Cessna 175 makes these planes great for short take off and landing operations.

The 175 model had Cessna’s newly designed split level instrument panel, placing all of the primary flight instruments directly in front of the pilot, instead of spreading them out over the panel like earlier models. This makes them much better for IFR use then the previous Cessna models.

The 175 is not a noisy plane as the GO-300 geared engine runs the propeller at low revs (a maximum of 2400), however, the small whirring noise of the gear reduction drive will take some getting used to by those not familiar with it.

The Cessna 175 offers a comfortable ride so that longer journeys can be undertaken without the fear of stiff limbs and bad backs at the end of it! The cabin is thoughtfully laid out but it is the high wings that are perhaps the best feature for the pilot and passengers alike. The high wings allow for uninterrupted views from all angles, making leisure flying a real joy.

Between 1958 and 1962, a total of 2,106 Cessna 175s were built, so they are not the most frequent sight at airfields. But they are definitely worth considering if you are interested in buying an affordable and reliable light aircraft.

[ad_2]

Source by Yvonne Copeland

Categories : DESTINATIONS, EMBRAER, FALCON, GULFSTREAM, HAWKER, JET NEWS, LARGE SIZE BODY JETS, LIGHT SIZE BODY JETS, MEDIUM SIZE BODY JETS, PRIVATE JET AFRICA, PRIVATE JET ASIA, PRIVATE JET AUSTRALIA, PRIVATE JET AVIONICS, PRIVATE JET BUILDER, PRIVATE JET CHARTER, PRIVATE JET CHATER, PRIVATE JET EUROPE, PRIVATE JET MAINTENANCE, PRIVATE JET MIDDLE EAST, PRIVATE JET SOUTH AMERICA, PRIVATE JET TIPS, PRIVATE JET USA, PRIVATE JETS DEALS, TRANSATLANTIC, TRANSPACIFIC
Posted by narrapresley
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments Off on Why Buy a Cessna 175 Skylark Light Airplane?
Mlkjets private charter helicopter3 - Long Island's Commercial Aviation Heritage: Aircraft

[ad_1]

Long Island, with its treeless expanse known as the Hempstead Plains, proximity to Manhattan, and gateway to the country and the European continent by means of the Atlantic Ocean, gave rise to numerous, once-famous aircraft manufacturers, including the American Aeronautical Corporation, the American Airplane and Engine Corporation, Brewster, Burnelli, Columbia, Cox-Klemin, Curtiss, EDO, Fairchild, Grumman, Ireland, the LWF Engineering Company, Loening, Orenco, Ranger, Republic, Sikorsky, Sperry, and Vought. Producing airplanes, powerplants, and components, they built pioneer designs and biplanes during the 1910s and 1920s, introduced significant advancements during the two-decade Golden Age between 1919 and 1939, and churned out military fighters that were considered integral elements in the arsenal of democracy during the Second World War.

Although these East Coast companies were but shadows of those on the West Coast, such as Boeing, Douglas (later McDonnell-Douglas), and Lockheed, which endowed the world with piston, turboprop, pure-jet, and turbofan passenger-carrying airliners, their Long Island counterparts produced a few notable types in this category.

American Airplane and Engine Corporation:

The American Airplane and Engine Corporation’s first-and, in the event, only-airliner was the Pilgrim 100, which was conceptualized by Fairchild, but was subsequently continued by the new company, itself a division of the Aviation Corporation. It planted its roots in the former Fairchild factory at Republic Airport in 1931. It represented, to a degree, the influence an aircraft manufacturer could exert on an airline.

William Littlewood, general manager of the original Fairchild Engine factory, and Myron Gould Beard, a pilot and engineer there, ultimately took up employment at then-named American Airways (now American Airlines) and the former’s first significant assignment was to develop specifications for a cost-effective airliner. “Airliner” then signified no more than a dozen passengers.

“Out of this assignment came the Pilgrim, the first commercial transport to be designed according to an airline’s specifications,” according to Robert J. Serling in Eagle: The Story of American Airlines (St. Martin’s/Marek, 1985, p. 19). “It was a single-engine plane carrying nine passengers and flown by a single pilot. The cockpit was inaccessible from the cabin; messages to the passengers were passed through a sliding panel in a bulkhead.”

Principally designed by Fairchild Chief Engineer Otto Kirchner and Project Engineer John Lee, it was the result of Avco’s $35,000 study to replace the existing single-engine types that proved too small for American’s needs, while the trimotors offered too much capacity. The initial, 15-aircraft order supplied the carrier’s Embry-Riddle, Southern, and Universal divisions.

Powered by a 575-hp Pratt and Whitney, nose-mounted R-1340 Wasp engine, the Pilgrim featured a high, straight, fabric-covered wing; three passenger windows and a fourth at the top of the exit door on either side of its fuselage; two single-wheel main undercarriage bogies truss-rigged from the wing; a tailwheel; and an enclosed, single-person cockpit and nine-passenger cabin. The production 100A version was equipped with a 575-hp Pratt and Whitney Hornet B-16 engine, which was replaced by the equally-rated Wright Cyclone R-1820 radial on the 100B that itself introduced a larger vertical tail. American also operated this variant.

Featuring a 39.2-foot overall length and a 57.5-foot wingspan, it carried a 2,150-pound payload and had a 7,100-pound gross weight. Range was 510 miles. Cruising speed was 118 mph. And its service ceiling was 13,600 feet.

Of the 26 Pilgrims produced, American operated 22 100As and 100Bs, and the US Army Air Corps flew four designated Y1C-24, employing them on light cargo and supply missions. In their later aeromedical evacuation role, they accommodated four liter patients.

Former American Pilgrims found favor in Alaska.

“Pilgrim aircraft were a favorite among Alaskan bush pilots during he time when air transportation was establishing superiority over dog teams, steamboats, and railroads in transporting passengers and freight in the territory of Alaska,” according to the National Register of Historic Places’ Inventory Nomination Form.

Because of their rugged reliability, they established an intra-state aerial infrastructure, more than half of the civil and military Pilgrims providing passenger, cargo, supply, and mail lifelines to remote outposts and isolated communities surrounded by ground-inaccessible terrain between 1936 and 1938, operating in harsh climates, and alighting on ill-equipped fields with wheels and aquatic surfaces with floats alike. Bush pilots flew them well into the 1960s.

Because of the Great Depression, the American Airplane and Engine Corporation ceased operating in mid-1932 and once again reverted to its Fairchild foundation.

Burnelli:

Only a pair of very unique aircraft emerged from the workshop of Vincent J. Burnelli, who flew two gliders before taking root in Amityville in 1920. But they reflected his advanced design philosophy.

Aside from serving as the common attachment point for its aerodynamic surfaces and the load-carrying location of its pilot, passengers, and cargo, a fuselage, he believed, needed to compensate for some of its drag by augmenting lift, leading him to create a camber-incorporating, airfoil-shaped lifting body.

Featuring a plywood frame covered in duralumin, it had a 14-foot wide, slab-sided shape, with upper and lower curvatures that tapered to a knife-life edge at its rear, giving it a 41.2-foot overall length. But its 504-square-foot surface produced almost a third of its lift and its width facilitated the installation of two side-by-side, 10.4-foot separated, nose-mounted, 400-hp liquid-cooled Liberty XII V-12 piston engines that drove five-foot, 1.5-inch, three-bladed propellers; two side-by-side cockpits, each for a single pilot and mechanic; and a cavernous interior for up to 30 passengers or oversized cargo.

Designated RB-1, for “Remington-Burnelli,” it first flew from Curtiss Filed on June 2, 1921, but the damage it sustained from a storm while on the ground led to its improved RB-2 successor of 1924

Powered, in this case, by two 650-hp Galloway Atlantic engines and introducing improved control surfaces, it represented the first widebody, the first widebody biplane, the first twin-engine, nose-mounted aircraft, the first airfoil-shaped lifting body, and the first freighter, the latter of whose capability was demonstrated in 1925 when it transported an Essex automobile, serving as an aerial showroom for the Hudson Motor Car Company, again both firsts for an airplane.

Although it introduced a considerable number of advanced features, it was slow and sluggish and failed to attract the necessary funding for the development that could have led to the RB-3.

Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor Company:

The Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor Company, reflecting the name of its founder, Glenn Hammond Curtiss, produced a handful of passenger-carrying transports on Long Island, after it established a research and development facility there in 1918. One of them was the Eagle.

Based upon the structural foundation laid by the Oriole, but enlarged, it was intended as a post-World War I airliner and introduced several advanced features that distinguished it from the many converted, open-cockpit, military biplanes often used for such a purpose, including a streamlined, monocoque fuselage; an enclosed cockpit; an enclosed cabin with eight to nine leather upholstered seats, curtained glass windows, dome lights, and an early air stair; three-bay, unstaggered, equal-span biplane wings; a conventional tail; and two sets of tandem main wheels, as well as the standard tail one. First of its three versions was the result of the number of their engines.

The Eagle I, for example, with a 36.9-foot length and a 61.4-foot wingspan, was the trimotor variant, initially powered by three 150-hp Curtiss K-6 pistons, although production aircraft featured 160-hp C-6s. With a 7,450-pound gross weight, it had a 475-mile range and a 100-mph speed.

Powered by two 400-hp Curtiss C-12s, the twin-engine Eagle II offered improved performance, with a 124-mph maximum speed and a 750-mile range. However, only one was built and it crashed on its maiden flight.

Three of the single-engine Eagle IIIs, powered by a 400-hp Liberty 12, saw US Army Air Corps service in the personnel transport and aeromedical role. The type notched up a payload record when it carried 3,533 pounds over Curtiss Field in 1920.

Although the type introduced numerous advancements, only 20 or so were, in the end, produced because of the failure of the envisioned commercial market to develop.

Of greater notoriety was another Long Island-born airliner, the Curtiss Condor, of which there were two major versions. Both represented transitional technology, serving as bridges between the bi- and monoplane, examples of the latter including the Boeing 247 and the Douglas DC-2.

“In most respects, (the Condor) was a step backwards in aircraft design-a twin-engine biplane whose forest of struts and wires provided built-in headwinds,” Serling commented (op. cit., p. 55).

Although it was slow and lumbering and clung, like an airplane that could not relinquish its biplane past, to the features that categorized it, it was considered the first sleeper transport, whose comfort emulated the railroad’s Pullman berths, a necessity on stretches that required the morning set of the alarm to reach throughout the night.

Advancement took root in the Model 32 of 1933. Powered by two 710-hp, nine-cylinder Wright SCR-1820-F3 radials that turned three-bladed, variable-pitch propellers and thus reduced the noise and vibration that otherwise propagated through the cabin like a tuning fork, the Condor II, the result of frame-and-fabric construction, had a 49.6-foot length (shorter than its Condor I predecessor), and an 82-foot wingspan built with a tubular spar. Only a single vertical and horizontal tailplane was employed.

Accommodation in a cabin blanketed with 70 pounds of soundproofing material was for 15 day or 12 night-berth passengers, who were attended to by a then-called stewardess.

First flying on January 30, 1933, it had a 17,500-pound gross weight, an 840-mile range, and a 22,000-foot service ceiling.

American, which made a $500,000 order for ten, placed them into sleeper service between Ft. Worth and Los Angeles, which constituted a portion of its transcontinental route, on May 5, 1934, offering a competitive advantage over TWA and United, which could not offer comparable comfort. It was also used to increase its daily round trip frequencies between New York and Chicago in September, advertising in its June 15, 1934 system timetable, “The world’s first complete sleeper planes.” One such route included Dallas, Ft. Worth, Abilene, Big Spring, and El Paso in Texas, Douglas, Tucson, and Phoenix in Arizona, and Los Angeles in California.

“Passengers loved the Condor’s roomy cabin,” according to Serling (ibid, p. 56). “In American’s configuration, the big biplane carried 18 passengers by day and could accommodate 14 in the surprisingly spacious berths. Compared to the noisy, rattling Fords and cramped Stinsons and Vultees, the Condor interior was palatial and compensated for the airliner’s abysmal performance.”

Of the 45 produced, which was not an insignificant quantity for their time, they wore the colors of Swissair in Europe and Avianca and LAN-Chile in South America, and served in military roles with the Army Air Corps, the Navy, and the Marines in the US and with the air forces of China, Colombia, Honduras, Peru, and the UK elsewhere.

Fairchild Aircraft Company:

Founded by Sherman Mills Fairchild, the Farmingdale-based Fairchild aircraft Company arose from the need to design a suitable aerial platform that was both stable and possessed sufficient internal space from which to capture shots with the photographic equipment he designed and built during the 1920s. Since none of the existing airframes were appropriate enough, he created his own, which took form as the FC-1.

Its longer, light transport FC-2, powered by a 220-hp Wright J-5 Whirlwind, proved both rugged and flexible, operating many missions within diverse geographic and climactic regions, flying in Canada, in the jungles and mountains of South America, and in the bottom-of-the-world, ice-capped Antarctic continent.

It enabled Pan American, only by chance, to operate the Key West-Havana international airmail contract it had been awarded on July 16, 1927. To avoid losing it by failing to do so by the October 19 target, which would have occurred because of the late delivery of the two Fokker F. VIIs it had otherwise ordered for the service, it chartered a float-equipped example, operating a delivery flight to West Indian Aerial Express and named “La Nina.” Loaded with seven 25-pound sacks collectively carrying 30,000 letters transferred from the Florida East Coast-Atlantic Coast Railroad’s “Havana Special” run, it made the one-hour flight from Key West, landing in Havana at 0925 on the October 19 deadline date.

West Indian Aerial Express, which was financially backed by Sherman Fairchild himself, along with Graham Grosvenor, inaugurated service two months later, on December 3, between Port-au-Prince, Haiti, and San Juan, Puerto Rico, with a fleet of FC-2s, explaining its choice of equipment.

Later that month, on December 17, Colonial Western Airways began passenger, mail, and express service with the FC-2 between Cleveland and Buffalo with an intermediate stop in Erie, and extended it to Albany via Rochester, Syracuse, Utica, and Schenectady on June 1, 1928.

The FC-2W, which accommodated six, saw Canadian Colonial Airways service, which operated it between New York and Montreal.

The ultimate evolution of the FC-2-and the best-selling of the version, with 200 built-was the Fairchild 71. Powered by a Pratt and Whitney nine-cylinder Wasp radial engine, it accommodated nine passengers, had a 5,500-ound gross weight, and a 900-mile range.

Suitable for light-transport and airliner service, it was operated by Compania Mexicana de Aviacion, which was founded on August 20, 1924 and inaugurated a Mexico City-Tampico route with it four years later, on April 15. It subsequently also deployed it to Merida on the Yucatan Peninsula in October.

Coastal Airways commenced six-passenger, float-equipped Model 71 service from North Beach Airport, where it offered connections with other flying boat operators, to Albany up the Hudson River on May 28, 1929.

Pacific Alaska Airways operated the Fairchild 71, while other carriers pioneered interior routes with Stinson Juniors, Travel Airs, and Waco biplanes.

Between 1925 and 1931, the year Fairchild relocated to Maryland, it produced an admirable 369 aircraft of all types.

Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation:

Founded by Leroy Randle Grumman, who was once plant manager of the Loening Aircraft and Engineering Corporation, on January 2, 1930, the Grumman Aircraft and Engineering Corporation itself planted its initial-although hardly sedentary–roots in Baldwin, moving to progressively larger facilities-first to Valley Stream eight miles away, then to the Fairchild Flying Field 16 miles away in Farmingdale, and finally to the sprawling Bethpage plant with which it was, for the most part, synonymous, on April 8, 1937. The need for even more space prompted its secondary location at the United States Naval Air Facility designated its “Peconic River” plant, in 1953.

Principally a supplier to the Navy, Marines, and Coast Guard, it produced its famous F2F, F3F, F4F Wildcat, F6F Hellcat, F7F Tigercat, F8F Bearcat, F9F Panther and Cougar, F11F Tiger, TBF Avenger, and F-14 Tomcat series, which were instrumental in the victorious conclusion of several wars.

Although, like Fairchild, it never designed a bonafide “airliner,” a few of its aircraft were operated in this role in limited numbers, three of which were amphibians and one of which was a land-based executive design.

The first, the G-21 Goose, was the company’s first monoplane.

“In 1936, the Grumman Aircraft Corporation of Bethpage was approached by several wealthy Long Island residents who needed a small plane for personal transportation,” according to Stoff (op. cit., p. 29). “They wanted an aircraft large enough to carry their families and baggage on trips, luxurious enough to fit their business needs, and flexible enough to take off and land either from the land or the sea.”

Representing transitional technology, the Goose featured a riveted aluminum structure with a 38.3-foot overall length; a high-mounted wing, which had a 49-foot span and 375-square-foot area, but incorporated aft, fabric-covered sections and control surfaces; two outboard wing floats; two nine-cylinder, 450-hp Pratt and Whitney Junior radials attached to the leading edge; a two-step hull for aquatic surface operations; a conventional tail; two single-wheel, upward-retracting main wheels for nesting in the fuselage sides; and a tail wheel.

The enclosed cabin, located behind the two-person cockpit, accommodated up to eight and was entered by an aft, port door, and convenience was provided by a small galley and a lavatory. Baggage compartments were in the nose and behind the cabin.

“The ease of handling, good stability, and satisfactory performance demonstrated during the trails soon made the Goose a very popular aircraft with civil and military customers alike,” according to Rene J. Francillon in Grumman Aircraft since 1929 (Putnam Aeronautical Books, 1989, pp 96-97). “Moreover, it proved to have a very strong airframe, thus endowing many of the 345 aircraft built by Grumman between May 1937 and October 1945 with a long service life.”

Its $60,000 price tag did not deter orders.

Aside from providing, as intended, comfortable transportation from water-fronting Long Island mansions to Wall Street and being used for similar, private purposes in the rest of the country, Canada, and the UK, this forerunner of the modern turboprop and jet executive transport had commercial application, as indicated by KNILM, KLM’s East Indian subsidiary, operation of it in March of 1940.

In the Caribbean, St. Croix-based Antilles Air Boats operated 18 G-21s, linking several islands as of February 1964, and Mackey Airlines connected Miami with the Bahamas with its own G-21As until Eastern acquired it in 1967.

Two carriers used the type for the short, 21-mile hop from the California coast to Catalina Island-Avalon Air Transport from Long Beach and Catalina Seaplanes from San Pedro Harbor.

Of the 13 G-21s Alaska Coastal Airlines operated, one was turboprop-retrofitted.

Resembling, in overall configuration, the G-21 Goose, the G-73 Mallard was designed as larger, post-war feederliner for inter-island or mainland-to-island passenger service. Work on it began in December of 1944.

Incorporating some advanced features, it had a stressed-skin, two-step fuselage, giving it a 48.4-foot overall length; a high, float-equipped wing with wingtip fuel tanks, resulting in a 66.8-foot span and a 444-square-foot area; two 600-hp Pratt and Whitney R-1340-S3H1 radials that turned three-bladed, fully-feathering propellers; and a passenger capacity of between ten and 15, the latter attained by replacing the aft lavatory and baggage compartment with five seats. Its gross weight was 12,750 pounds. Range, with an 810-pound payload, was 1,380 miles and cruise speed was 180 mph. A noted deviation from the Goose design was its tricycle undercarriage.

Registered NX41824, the first G-73 Mallard first flew on April 30, 1946, four months before its September 8 type certification.

Although it mostly served in the corporate role, the aircraft, which was underpowered because of the lack of a more suitable powerplant, was ordered by Air Commuting, the only carrier to do so for a factory-fresh example. But it did enjoy a respectable second-hand airline career with smaller companies in Alaska, Canada, the Caribbean, Australia, Japan, and French Polynesia. A significant operator was Chalk’s.

Grumman’s significantly overestimated market size for the type, however, resulted in a paltry 59-aircraft production run between 1946 and 1951.

Grumman’s first land-based executive aircraft counterpart was the G-1.

A radically divergent “design solution” that was to incorporate both performance and economy, the low, straight-wing monoplane, designated Model 159, ultimately sported a 78.4-foot span, but power transitioned from the piston engine to the turbine, in light of the speed and efficiency of the emerging Vickers Viscount, the world’s first turboprop airliner, to satisfy market study calls for 350-mph speeds.

The engines, in the event, were versions of those that powered that British design-in this case, 2,210-shp Rolls Royce Dart 529-8s that drove four-bladed propellers, giving it its 334-mph cruise speed. Its maximum takeoff weight, range, and service ceiling were, respectively, 35,000 pounds, 2,500 miles, and 36,900 feet.

Unlike its amphibious counterpart, the Goose, it had a conventional fuselage, in which ten business and up to 24 three-abreast, high-density passengers sat, with views through circular windows, and the aircraft itself sat on a retractable, tricycle undercarriage.

Although its civil version served in the corporate role with such companies as General Electric, Martin Marietta, Northrop, Ford, General Motors, and Texaco, its superior performance proved an expensive operation for regional airlines, which could purchase similarly-powered Rolls Royce RDa.7 Fokker F.27-200s and Hawker Siddeley HS.748-2s with more than double its capacity.

Nevertheless, the type saw some airline operations in Canada by Wardair, in the US by Bonanza, Golden West, and Zantop, in the UK by Birmingham Executive, in France by Air Provence, and in Italy by Aeri Speciali, which served the Bologna-Birmingham route with it. Installation of an aft, port, upward-opening door enabled DHL and Purolator to transport small packages with it.

During the 11-year period between August of 1958 and May of 1969, 200 G-1s were built.

Of greater regional airline application was the 9.6-foot stretched, Savanah, Georgia-based Gulfstream American G-1C Commuter, which took over the G-1 program. With a 7,600-pound payload capability and a 600-mile maximum payload range, the aircraft, resulting from conversions of existing airframes, accommodated 38 three-abreast passengers at a 29-inch seat pitch, with a forward lavatory and an aft, 144-square-foot baggage compartment.

The first stretched G-1C, registered N5400C, first flew on October 25, 1979, received its FAA certification the following year, and was launched into service by Air North, which operated a New York State route system and provided both origin-and-destination and connecting service at La Guardia Airport. The type also wore the liveries of Air US and Air Chaparral.

Republic Aviation Corporation:

The Republic Rainbow was an example of a Long Island-spawned airliner that had significant potential, but never materialized in reality.

The Republic Aviation Corporation itself traces its roots to Seversky Aircraft, which was established by the Russian emigre of the same name. Possessing a sixth sense for high-speed aerodynamic designs, he produced the P-35 fighter that set speed records and won racing awards. He subsequently relocated to Farmingdale facilities.

Despite his design capability, his business and marketing talents were severely lacking, resulting in abysmal sales and prompting his Board of Directors to ironically vote him-the company’s very founder-out during his 1938 sales trip to England.

Reorganized and renamed the Republic Aviation Corporation, it proved the necessary tactic to reverse its fortunes, leading to Army Air Corps orders for its P-43 Lancer fighter. Synonymous, however, with the P-47 Thunderbolt, which was nicknamed “The Jug,” it produced the first piston aircraft able to achieve a 400-mph speed and notched up sales that almost reached the 10,000-mark, as the company became the second-largest fighter supplier to the Air Corps.

Reflecting this speed capability was the XF-12 Rainbow. Designed to fulfill the Army Air Corps’ Air Tactical Service Command’s needs for a high-speed and -altitude reconnaissance aircraft, particularly to record enemy installations over Japan, the streamlined, quad-engine, low-wing aircraft, emulating the graceful lines of the Lockheed Constellation, had commercial airliner potential.

“The Rainbow, with a design altitude of 40,000 feet, a payload of 12,000 pounds, and a cruising speed of about 400 mph, held out great promise,” according to Davies (op. cit., p. 328). “Pan American and American Airlines placed provisional orders. But severe problems with the engine and controls caused abandonment of the project.”

The RC-2, its commercial counterpart, would have introduced a five-foot fuselage stretch, a 46-passenger capacity, a lounge, a galley, uprated engines, and an increased fuel capacity. It would have been a serious-and superior-performance-contender as a transcontinental airliner in competition with the Lockheed Constellation itself and the Douglas DC-6.

“Officially designated the Republic XF-12, the Rainbow was a sleek, needle-nosed speedster, whose specifications called for a 400-mph cruising speed, nonstop transatlantic range, a then-unheard-of altitude capability of 40,000 feet, and a passenger capacity of 46,” according to Serling (op. cit., p. 197).

The RC-2’s engine difficulties, a rise in its acquisition price, and the lower operating costs of widely available, war-surplus C-54s (the military version of the DC-4), resulted in the cancellation of American’s and Pan American’s provisional orders, dousing Long Island’s airliner light and all but eliminating its chance of competing with the West Coast aircraft manufacturer giants.

Saab-Fairchild:

Aside from the Grumman Goose, the Mallard, the G-1, and the G-1C, Long Island was the birthplace of a conceptual commuter airliner, at least in collaboration.

Its origins-the need for a 30-passenger type to slot in between existing 19- and 50-seaters-led Saab-Scania of Sweden, which had had mostly military experience, to sign an agreement with Fairchild, which had already had exposure to this commercial sector with its own Swearingen Metro. The former would produce the fuselage and the vertical stabilizers, as well as carry out final assembly, in Linkoping, while the latter would build the wings, the engine nacelles, and the tailplane. Although the venture would reduce Saab’s costs of what proved to be its largest industrial program, Fairchild’s marketing and familiarization with the commuter segment were also considered advantages.

“An agreement signed on January 25, 1980 between Saab-Scania of Sweden and Fairchild Industries of the USA served to launch the SF-340 commuter airliner as the first fully collaborative venture between an American and a European company,” according to William Green and Gordon Swanborough in An Illustrated Guide to the World’s Airliners (Arco Publishing, Inc., 1982, p. 168).

The resultant clean, low-wing design incorporated a pressurized, circular cross section fuselage for 34 three-abreast passengers, provisioned with a small galley, a lavatory, and enclosed overhead storage compartments on its seat-pair side, giving it a 64.9-foot overall length; a straight, high-aspect ratio wing of 70.4-foot span and 450-square-foot area with single-slotted trailing edge flaps; two 1,675-shp General Electric CT7-5A turboprops; a conventional tail; and a retractable, tricycle undercarriage.

It first flew on January 25, 1983 and was inaugurated into service by launch customer Crossair of Switzerland the following year. Both Business Express and later American Eagle offered multiple daily flights from nearby Long Island MacArthur Airport to Boston with it.

After Fairchild completed 108 ship sets in Farmingdale, it terminated its agreement with Saab Scania and withdraw from all civil projects, leaving the very successful commuter airliner to be re-designated S-340 in 1985.

Sikorsky Aero Engineering Corporation:

Like Alexander P. de Seversky, Igor I. Sikorsky immigrated from Russia to the US, arriving on American shores with dreams, drives, and aeronautic blood coursing through his veins, but little more than lint in his pockets.

Five years after stepping ashore on this side of the Atlantic, in 1924, he planted Long Island roots that grew into the Sikorsky Aero Engineering Corporation and in it concentrated on one of two aircraft types with which he would become synonymous-the amphibious flying boat, with the other being the rotary-wing helicopter.

Although the first of the former, the S-34, nosed into Long Island Sound near College Point on May 31,1927 after one of its two engines failed at 800 feet, the succeeding S-38, the theoretical second designed between May and July of the following year, fared far better. Functional it was. Art it was not.

Amphibiously ambedetrix-if there is such a term-it was a combined aquatic and air “structure” that displayed the decidedly separate, but somehow connected aspects needed to operate in both realms: a short, hull-shaped fuselage and a high, straight wing, v-strut attached to the smaller, lower, hull-extending one. From the upper were slug two Pratt and Whitney Wasp radials and from tis trailing edge twin booms that ended at the tailplane itself, consisting of a horizontal stabilizer from which two vertical surfaces extended both above and below.

“While considered an ugly duckling by some, it quickly proved to be one of the most efficient and practical airplanes of its time” according to “The Pan Am Connection” article in the June 2000 issue of the Sikorsky Archives News. “A Navy test pilot of the time called it a better ship than any other of its size and power.”

It saw considerable airline service.

Because of its capability, it was instrumental in Pan American’s Caribbean, Central American, and South American route development, beginning with the October 13, 1928 operation of it. Air field shortage proved no obstacle. As Andre Priester, its chief engineer, pointed out, “Flying boats carried their own airports on their bottom.”

Pan American ultimately operated 38 of the 111 produced.

The type opened up international passenger service on May 22 of the following year, bridging the 2,064 miles to the Canal Zone during a 56-hour journey, although it required overnight stops in Belize and Managua, both in Central America.

Six months later, Inter-Island Airways, which was founded in January, commenced scheduled service from Honolulu to Maui, Hilo, and Kauai with two eight-passenger S-38s, effective November 11. Molokai and Lanai were served on request.

Retrospect:

While Long Island aircraft manufacturers could never vie with the major airliner producers on the West Coast, their low-capacity, multi-role and -mode, air, water, and ground, land-based and amphibious designs, often crossing the bridge from military to civil and commercial operation, proved instrumental in pioneering early US and international passenger transporting routes in regions as diverse as Alaska, the Hawaiian Island, Europe, the Caribbean, Central America, South America, and the Pacific.

Article Sources:

Davies, R. E. G. Airlines of the United States since 1914. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1998.

Francillon, Rene J. Grumman Aircraft since 1929. London: Putnam Aeronautical Books, 1989.

Green, William, and Swanborough, Gordon. An Illustrated Guide to the World’s Airliners. New York: Arco Publishing, Inc., 1982.

Serling, Robert J. Eagle: The Story of American Airlines. New York: St. Martin’s/Marek, 1985.

Stoff, Joshua. Historic Aircraft and Spacecraft in the Cradle of Aviation Museum. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications, 2001.

“The Pan Am Connection.” Sikorsky Archives News. Stratford, Connecticut: Igor I. Sikorsky Historical Archives, Inc., June 2000.

Waldvogel, Robert G. “Long Island’s Aviation Heritage.” AAHS Journal. American Aviation Historical Society, Winter 2020.

Waldvogel, Robert G. “The History of Republic Airport.” EzineArticles. July 27, 2017.

Waldvogel, Robert G. “The History of the Grumman Corporation.” EzineArticles. October 10, 2019.

[ad_2]

Source by Robert Waldvogel

Categories : DESTINATIONS, EMBRAER, FALCON, GULFSTREAM, HAWKER, JET NEWS, LARGE SIZE BODY JETS, LIGHT SIZE BODY JETS, MEDIUM SIZE BODY JETS, PRIVATE JET AFRICA, PRIVATE JET ASIA, PRIVATE JET AUSTRALIA, PRIVATE JET AVIONICS, PRIVATE JET BUILDER, PRIVATE JET CHARTER, PRIVATE JET CHATER, PRIVATE JET EUROPE, PRIVATE JET MAINTENANCE, PRIVATE JET MIDDLE EAST, PRIVATE JET SOUTH AMERICA, PRIVATE JET TIPS, PRIVATE JET USA, PRIVATE JETS DEALS, TRANSATLANTIC, TRANSPACIFIC
Posted by narrapresley
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments Off on Long Island’s Commercial Aviation Heritage: Aircraft
Private Charter Air Taxi2 - Charter Your Way To The Indy 500

[ad_1]

The Indy 500 is a prestigious race that is run each Memorial Day weekend in Speedway Indiana. The cars have changed somewhat since that first race back in 1911 but the greatest spectacle in racing still brings people from far and wide to the 2.5 mile oval track come race day.

They come for the roar of the engines, for the thrills of the race, for the atmosphere and for the history of the event and they come in droves, since the racetrack can hold upwards of 300,000 people.

If you live near Indiana then it’s easy to take in the event each year, but if you don’t why would you fly commercial when you can easily charter a jet to get you there in style? It is cheaper than you may realize and it saves all the hassles of flying commercial like the long security lines and the cramped seating. Instead, sit back, relax and relish all of the head, shoulder, elbow and leg room that you get while you are chilling with your party on route to Indiana.

It’s not easy to win the Indy 500 that starts with eleven rows of three to make up the 33 car field. Three drivers hold the title of most wins at Indy with four apiece. They are A.J. Foyt, Al Unser and Rick Mears. Rick Mears also holds the record, alone this time for the most pole positions achieved with 6. The great owner Roger Penske is the most successful at Indy, with 16 wins and 17 poles for his drivers.

It’s also not easy to get to Indy on a commercial flight, not if you like room and simplicity that is. The one thing that commercial flights and the Indy 500 have in common is milk. You can get milk on the plane and if you win at Indy, you are given a bottle of milk in the winners circle. This tradition started back in 1933 when a driver asked for milk after winning the race. A dairy executive saw a marketing edge there and well, the rest is history. If you win you are given the choice of whole, 2% or skim milk to chug for the world to see.

The next Indy promises to be an exciting race, like the ones before have been. Will the pole sitter win? Will someone come from behind? Will you be there to witness it?

[ad_2]

Source by Amanda J Hales

Categories : DESTINATIONS, EMBRAER, FALCON, GULFSTREAM, HAWKER, JET NEWS, LARGE SIZE BODY JETS, LIGHT SIZE BODY JETS, MEDIUM SIZE BODY JETS, PRIVATE JET AFRICA, PRIVATE JET ASIA, PRIVATE JET AUSTRALIA, PRIVATE JET AVIONICS, PRIVATE JET BUILDER, PRIVATE JET CHARTER, PRIVATE JET CHATER, PRIVATE JET EUROPE, PRIVATE JET MAINTENANCE, PRIVATE JET MIDDLE EAST, PRIVATE JET SOUTH AMERICA, PRIVATE JET TIPS, PRIVATE JET USA, PRIVATE JETS DEALS, TRANSATLANTIC, TRANSPACIFIC
Posted by narrapresley
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments Off on Charter Your Way To The Indy 500
Embraer LINEAGE 1000E Private Jet Charter EMBRAER LINEAGE 1000E PRIVATE JET HIRE EMBRAER PRIVATE CHARTER MLKJETS6 - Charter To The Belmont

[ad_1]

Held each year at Belmont Park in New York, the Belmont Stakes has always been known as The Test of the Champion as it is the last of the Triple Crown races and also the longest at one and a half miles long. It is open to three year old horses, fillies and colts alike who want to take their chances at either completing the Triple Crown (if they have been lucky enough to win the previous two races) or in upsetting the front runner and favourite.

In some years the Belmont Stakes may mean a new champ is crowned, but as there have only been twelve horses in history to take the Triple Crown, the Belmont is usually just a great race between amazing horses who duke it out in the Run for the Carnations.

It is the oldest of the Triple Crown races, with the Kentucky Derby and Preakness Stakes being the other two, and if you don’t live in New York but want to attend, how about chartering a jet to do just that?

Chartering a jet gives you plenty of leg, shoulder, head and elbow room and allows you to get to where you want to go on your schedule, not that of the major commercial airlines. There is also reduced security waiting time, and you know that your luggage will be with you at all times, not headed off in the opposite direction.

One of the best things about a charter jet is that they can land at smaller airports avoiding the crowds at the major hubs around the country. This means you spend less time navigating the crowds and more time enjoying your trip.

So, who will be the next big star that emerges from the Belmont? The fastest time ever is still held by the great Secretariat back in 1973. That year he also won the Kentucky Derby and the Preakness Stakes in record time, something we haven’t seen since. Secretariat also holds the record in the margin of victory category, as he won by thirty one lengths over the rest of the field.

Who will win the blanket of carnations next? And will you have arrived to see it in style and comfort or have battled the crowds and the commercial airlines and arrived frazzled and tired? Chartering is less expensive than you may think and think of all the hassle it saves.

[ad_2]

Source by Amanda J Hales

Categories : DESTINATIONS, EMBRAER, FALCON, GULFSTREAM, HAWKER, JET NEWS, LARGE SIZE BODY JETS, LIGHT SIZE BODY JETS, MEDIUM SIZE BODY JETS, PRIVATE JET AFRICA, PRIVATE JET ASIA, PRIVATE JET AUSTRALIA, PRIVATE JET AVIONICS, PRIVATE JET BUILDER, PRIVATE JET CHARTER, PRIVATE JET CHATER, PRIVATE JET EUROPE, PRIVATE JET MAINTENANCE, PRIVATE JET MIDDLE EAST, PRIVATE JET SOUTH AMERICA, PRIVATE JET TIPS, PRIVATE JET USA, PRIVATE JETS DEALS, TRANSATLANTIC, TRANSPACIFIC
Posted by narrapresley
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments Off on Charter To The Belmont
The best selection of private jet charter for charter a jet on 20206 scaled - 5 Benefits Of Booking A Private Air Ambulance

[ad_1]

If you are in a non-emergency situation, you can consider an air ambulance. This is a type of private jet, which offers the same level of comfort offered by a commercial transport service. This type of service offers a lot of benefits, but in this article, we are going to take a look at 5 of those benefits. Read on to know more.

Discretion

As the name suggests, a private air ambulance offers privacy. So, you can travel and still enjoy complete privacy while you are sick or need some medical attention. Although a commercial flight does provide a privacy curtain, it may not be a good choice if you don’t feel comfortable when other people are around. In this case, we suggest that you consider booking a private air ambulance.

A Myth about Privacy

Some people think that you are alone on a private jet, which is a common misconception. The fact of the matter is that you can take your family with you on the jet. The goal of the service provider is to make sure you feel as comfortable as possible. So, they do allow your family member to fly with you.

Whether you are looking to book an air ambulance to get back from a vacation or you want to go to a different location, you can hire this type of service.

Better Schedule

If you choose to use a commercial stretcher, you won’t have much freedom as far as the schedule is concerned. On the other hand, in case of a private jet, you can set a schedule that can best satisfy your needs. You can choose a date to fly as per your needs.

Attention

On an air ambulance, you will enjoy more attention. All of the staff on the plane will be there to serve you, including the pilots and nurses. You can never enjoy this type of experience on a commercial flight. The only person the crew will care about is you. So, you won’t have any problem. You will get whatever you ask for without any delays.

Customized Flight

You can customize your flight on the basis of your needs and wants. Actually, some medical devices are not allowed on a commercial airline. On the other hand, you have almost complete freedom on an air ambulance. On the plane, you will get everything, such as your medicine, IV fluids, and heart monitors, to name a few. The staff will try their level best to make sure you get the best medical care possible. This will help you enjoy your journey.

Long story short, both private and commercial service have their pros and cons. However, if you are on the lookout of the benefits explained this article, we suggest that you consider booking a private air ambulance. Almost all of the service providers offer free quotes, which can give you a pretty good idea of how much the service may cost. Hopefully, the article will help you book the right service to cover your needs.

[ad_2]

Source by Shalini M

Categories : DESTINATIONS, EMBRAER, FALCON, GULFSTREAM, HAWKER, JET NEWS, LARGE SIZE BODY JETS, LIGHT SIZE BODY JETS, MEDIUM SIZE BODY JETS, PRIVATE JET AFRICA, PRIVATE JET ASIA, PRIVATE JET AUSTRALIA, PRIVATE JET AVIONICS, PRIVATE JET BUILDER, PRIVATE JET CHARTER, PRIVATE JET CHATER, PRIVATE JET EUROPE, PRIVATE JET MAINTENANCE, PRIVATE JET MIDDLE EAST, PRIVATE JET SOUTH AMERICA, PRIVATE JET TIPS, PRIVATE JET USA, PRIVATE JETS DEALS, TRANSATLANTIC, TRANSPACIFIC
Posted by narrapresley
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments Off on 5 Benefits Of Booking A Private Air Ambulance
Corporate travel and jet travel solutio for jet corporate charter3 - How to Fix the Helicopter EMS Accident Rate

[ad_1]

Helicopter Emergency Medical Services(HEMS) is an industry at risk. Due to a rash of fatal accidents, the industry is sicker than the patients being flown. The air med business is dying because, instead of saving lives, it’s killing people, namely helicopter crews, and often their patients.

The problem didn’t happen overnight; the solution won’t come quickly, either.

From the beginning, air medical helicopters have experienced a high accident rate. The risk can never be eliminated, but it can be mitigated and reduced to the point where an air med accident is rare. The following treatise tells how that can be done. If all the initiatives listed here were put in place tomorrow, the HEMS accident rate would drop to near zero. Here’s the road map of how that can happen.

” First recommendation: for those programs requesting it, an immediate safety stand-down for FAA or other outside party review on all aspects of the HEMS operation.

One of the difficulties with the accident rate in air medical is simple semantics. What is an accident, and how are the statistics compiled? Here’s the bottom line: the stated expectation must be a zero accident rate.

A Special FAR is needed, a new regulation aimed specifically at air medical operations similar to the regs in place for helicopter tour operators. For years the FAA has been unwilling or unable to simply shut down an operator or individual program site for safety or regulatory violations. There should be the institution of an anonymous tip line to the FAA, a whistle-blower feature for passengers, crew, or other employees of the various operators to use, something similar to the NASA safety reporting form. The potential for abuse is always present with such a system; but the potential for increased transparency is, as well, and the issue is critical.

” Pilots must be better vetted and trained.

There are too many programs, and too many helicopter operators such that the pilot staffing pool is too thin. With lower experience levels, and more programs flying more aircraft more hours, a growing accident rate is almost inevitable. A direct link can be made between the start of hostilities in Iraq, and the latest rise in the rate of air medical accidents. Many veteran pilots with a military affiliation are flying overseas, leaving programs at home understaffed, or with less experienced pilots in cockpits, or both.

Given the fact that most air medical accidents are weather related this makes sense. Military pilots are better able to maintain control in IIMC. The skills military pilots acquire, both in flight and with access to simulators, also confer a level of confidence unavailable to non-military pilots.

Another reason air med requires more professionalism and oversight is, that programs are 24/7 operations, with a high percentage of flying at night. Pilot error is the single most common factor in air medical accidents, and current crew rest rules are inadequate to address that. Shutting down a program after dark is not an option*, as these are emergency response vehicles, and must be staffed accordingly.

” Instrument Flight capability for recovery only in all air medical helicopters.

If used correctly, IFR capability is a powerful risk reducer in HEMS operations. What operators commonly substitute for IFR capability is company policy which demands that pilots avoid instrument weather at all cost. But denial of upgraded capability is inexcusable in a company which offers aviation assets to the public. The FAA should demand IFR capability for air medical helicopters as part of the new SFAR. This would serve two purposes: it would give pilots needed options; it would increase the standard of companies competing for air med business, drive marginal operators away.

Let me be clear about this: I propose IFR capability for recovery only, not for launch. IFR equipment, coupled with ongoing instrument training, will go a long way toward eliminating air med accidents.

Most fatal accidents have happened en-route to a patient pickup, or after a pilot has aborted the flight, and turned toward home base. This says that air med crews are accepting missions in weather that’s marginal at best, an attempt to take off and check conditions over a commonly flown route. Just so, the more emphasis placed on weather avoidance, and dismissal of IFR capability in lieu of weather minimums and dogmatic measures, have made air medical less safe.

Pilots must find the delicate balance between program needs and their professional standing. Air med pilots are just charter pilots with a single client. But the trappings of the air med program, the flight suits, logos, and close interaction with medical staff is a constant enforcement of the team concept at a client hospital. There’s nothing wrong with team spirit. But the elite nature of air med flight crews can dilute a pilot’s command authority in situations where patient need appears to override aviation considerations. Weather factors can be minimized. Nuisance maintenance issues ignored. Crew rest times can be arbitrarily extended to pursue a patient mission at crew change time. At most programs, pilots are shielded from patient information, to avoid undue pressure on them to accept or reject a flight. This is a good protocol. But the simple truth is, that pilot exposure patient medical condition is unavoidable at the onset of the mission, or at any time during the flight. What’s needed is a more professional, more objective pilot in the first place.

Give site managers the authority they need to enforce safe practices. Site managers have little authority to enforce pilot codes, or punish unprofessional behavior. Most accidents begin in the hiring phase, lying in wait for the right conditions. Posting a pilot to a contract site is expensive. But when a client hospital demands a pilot’s removal, or a site manager learns of safety infractions, that manager must be able to take action.

Air medical flying has always had a reputation for having an emergency, rapid-response atmosphere. This sheen of excitement is what attracts certain people to it, the so-called adrenaline junkies. From my 20 years in a HEMS cockpit, I can attest to the high-profile nature of the work. There’s nothing more exciting than having the helicopter clatter out of the sky, arrive on scene, and land to save the day. The feeling is intoxicating, even if it is illusory. It’s easy to lose sight of the aviation aspect of it.

The bottom line is, that pilots at air med programs are locked and loaded to fly, and not every pilot is cut out for it. Accepting a mission is the default mode. But instead of being paid to fly, pilots must understand that they’re being paid for the judgement to not fly at times. FAR part 105, the so-called ‘pilot-in-command’ rule, not only protects pilots and the decisions they make, but it eliminates the potential hazard of a diluted decision, a decision made by a committee. Especially with the rapid growth of the HEMS industry, hour requirements and necessary experience levels have dropped. The pilot pool has shrunk beyond the competence level required.

” Multi-engine aircraft in air medical operations.

All air medical programs should field multi-engine helicopters. If that proves too much for the budget, the hospital should abandon the air medical program, or seek a consortium arrangement.

Having two engines, and the doubling of other on-board systems, simply brings the aviation asset up to par with the medical equipment it carries. Medical staff routinely have backups for everything; their aircraft should have nothing less.

Multi-engine aircraft also obviate additional mechanic staffing. Two mechanics are more efficient, better rested, doubly trained, and have more latitude toward performing required tasks to keep the equipment operating.

Another less obvious benefit to fielding twin-engine aircraft is the potential for pilot training. Depending on the aircraft, an extra seat is available in the cockpit on every flight. That empty seat ought to be used for an observer, a rookie pilot, or a new hire to ride along, to see first hand how the operation works.

Another advantage of this change is, that the copilot could be someone in training. If done properly, this position could be a revenue source for innovative operators willing to help a pilot build up his or her logbook, and willing to pay for the opportunity, to the benefit of the operator’s bottom line.

” CVR/FDR/TAWS/GPS moving map installation in air med helicopter cockpits.

The FAA should mandate cockpit voice recorders, and/or flight data recorders in every HEMS cockpit. This would add transparency to every air med mission. These boxes would have two additional benefits: they would assist in an accident investigation, a use for which they were designed; and they would facilitate maintenance work by recording and archiving system operating parameters. TAWS is nothing more than ground avoidance technology, another layer of protection. GPS should be a requirement in all HEMS cockpits.

” De-emphasize rapid response/takeoff time.

In spite of programs’ PR efforts, and patient impact evidence to the contrary, a rapid response only puts the aircraft and crew at risk, makes negligible difference in patient outcome, and should be de-emphasized. A launch time of ten minutes is not unreasonable. No other part 135 operation would advertise a five minute takeoff time, nor would the FAA grant operations specifications for such a thing. In actual practice, the HEMS mission is, by and large, a transport system to provide a stable, monitored environment for patients between hospitals.

” Higher program weather minimums, and mandatory down-status.

Weather is a factor in 50% of HEMS accidents. Program and FAA-mandated weather minimums are typically stringent, but at most programs they still border on marginal VFR. The environment in which air medical aircraft operate is typically where weather information is least available and/or reliable–below three thousand feet, far from weather reporting outlets, and often below radar coverage.

” Hospital administration must be more involved.

The administration of air med programs must become more intimately involved in day to day operations. Launch decisions should be reviewed; mandatory short takeoff times should be abandoned; borderline pilots, or those who consistently make poor decisions should be held accountable; safety committees should be established, with authority to make major decisions, including the configuration of the aircraft.

Medical directors should apprise physician staff of safety issues concerning air medical, including the need for better triage to eliminate non-emergent air transports. A culture of support must be effected for no-go decisions. The tendency for medical staff receiving a transport request is to use the helicopter if any indication exists that it’s needed. The underlying assumption is, that the patient needs to be flown, or a doctor would not have called.

But patients are often flown only for mundane logistical reasons. Various EMS services are available on a limited basis. Taking a ground rig away leaves the county uncovered for long periods. The helicopter is often used as a substitute in these cases. Thus, the air medical asset closest to the patient is often used when there’s no indication the patient needs to be flown.

I was a pilot in command of an air medical helicopter for twenty years. I understand the pressures and contingencies, regulations, environment and politics that air med pilots are exposed to every day. From my first air medical flight in July 1983, to my last in October 2003 I saw one of every kind of patient mission there is, except one. I never witnessed a birth on board the helicopter. That simple fact, that in 3,200 patient missions I never once witnessed a birth is instructive. It means triage for women about to deliver was done with utmost care. Both attending and receiving physicians knew not to call the helicopter.

The point is, that adequate triage, better consultation, or both, especially with today’s technical ability for doctors to share information, is a key in the air medical safety puzzle, because it means fewer flights, thus more attention to truly urgent flights.

With four pilots per contract, and where program hours are low anyway, the operator may (rightly) be concerned about less flying proficiency. In this case the sponsoring hospital should contract for more training hours, match their assets with another hospital in a consortium arrangement, or cede the air medical transport service altogether, thus saving needed health care dollars.

Do fewer flights mean lowered service to potential clients? No, it means better service to clients who need the service more. While flying a routine, stable hospital transfer patient, the helicopter is out of service to respond to a trauma, or other emergent patient.

“The bottom line must be secondary to safe practices, and hard aviation realities.

Typically, a hospital based helicopter system is set up on a mixed staff basis, with pilots and mechanics employed by the aviation vendor, and the hospital staff employed in house. Sponsoring hospitals can budget for aircraft services; they have the option of renewing a contract with a vendor–or not; they don’t assume the burden of aircraft maintenance, or staff training; and they avoid out of service time by having a backup aircraft within guidelines established in the contract. Leasing the asset also provides a hospital the opportunity to more easily upgrade to additional program functionality, such as IFR, NVG, multi-engine, or other changes.

But contracts offer only so much, and therein lies one of the more entrenched problems, with air medical safety often hanging in the balance: innovation is stifled, and safety initiatives shuttled between client and vendor, with little or no, or extremely slow resolution. There’s no direct connection between funding and safety, of course. But there needs to be more attention paid to backup systems for HEMS operations. No surgeon would operate when the hospital’s standby generator is out of service. No flight nurse would take off with no backup batteries for a heart monitor, or extra oxygen bottles. No hospital would place its million dollar MRI machinery uncovered in the parking lot, exposed to the elements.

But hospitals use single-engine helicopters, with VFR only cockpits, no NVG or GPS or TAWS capability, one electrical system, one hydraulic system, and one pilot on the overwhelming number of air med missions. The aircraft is typically parked on a pad outside, exposed to wind, rain, icing, heat, and all manner of corrosive elements, when hangarage could be acquired for little cost, keeping the helicopter dry, clean, ice and snow free, reducing maintenance issues, and more quickly prepared for flight.

Accountability is a very good thing. But due to the glacial pace of change in any institution, and given today’s focus on reducing health care costs, any innovation, regardless of how appealing or relevant to minimizing risk in the air medical environment, is inevitably caught up in the control/justification/budget triangle, with numerous layers of bureaucracy. In the meantime, needed innovations and safety measures are shelved, or passed between client and vendor, with neither accepting financial responsibility. Until such time as safety prevails in the air medical field, contracts should be renegotiated year to year, with an escape clause for both parties. This would allow clients to better budget for new innovations, and for operators to escape onerous contracts, better serve customer demands, and be more attentive to the bottom line in a field already littered with bankrupt operators.

One beneficial byproduct of yearly contracting would be to drive out marginal operators, by recognizing that only larger, more flexible companies can bid on and expect to win hospital contracts, which require a rapid turnaround of assets. Another advantage to one-year contracts is, that this would force standardization of equipment. Presently, even two aircraft sited at the same hospital often have different medical installations, radio packages, lighting, warning systems and cockpit instrumentation. This may not be a problem for a contract site using the same pilots all the time, (or it may be a major problem), but the lack of standardization precludes another solution to the air medical accident puzzle.

Pilots at a particular program operate with little or no oversight from company headquarters. In such an arrangement, pilots often share only among themselves the various problems, maintenance gripes, and operational glitches. There exists no mechanism for collective focus and sharing of safety information company-wide, except for contact through annual check flights, or a company newsletter of some kind. This is yet another reason client hospitals should employ larger companies, as they have more latitude to hire and employ check pilots and relief pilot staff to float between programs. Doing so would disseminate good data and safety practices across the company.

Larger companies are also better able to use another innovation that would enhance safe operations: the transfer, or shared pilot concept. Transference between contract sites would add to the transparency and oversight of programs, and increase the level of professionalism. This is yet another reason hospitals should field multi-engine aircraft. The unoccupied cockpit seat could be used to orient a relief or transfer pilot, as a company check pilot station, or again, to train a new hire pilot, a functionality unavailable to single-engine operations.

In addition to the transparency and increased knowledge base, visiting pilots would offer the medical staff an objective forum to discuss deficiencies in the program, or challenges with sited pilot staff. It would also have the desirable effect of decreasing whatever level of protective opacity that may exist in the ‘team oriented’ environment.

Yet another solution to safe operations is to decrease the level of team cohesion that may promote a protective amnesia about unsafe or marginal individuals, either aviation or medical staff. Client hospitals may even consider altering the makeup of flight staff, replacing the traditional flight nurse team with floating medical staff to go along with visiting pilot staff. This would place more emphasis on the ‘air’, and less on the ‘medical’ part of the equation, increasing the level of safety. Patients and nurses don’t crash; pilots and helicopters do.

One solution to this dilemma has already been listed, a solution that is open heresy to the air medical community. There are simply too many air medical helicopters, operating at too many hospitals, by too many vendors. If patient outcomes, mortality and morbidity were being positively affected, all to the good. But, after thirty years of operating air medical helicopters, there’s no objective evidence either of those is happening. Meantime, more air medical crews are dying in accidents. There’s plenty of anecdotal information, and hundreds of patients will testify to the good these aircraft and crews have done, as will I. But the simple, stark reality is, that air medical aviation is sicker than the patients it’s attempting to reach. Measures must be taken to change the situation.

” Reduce operating areas at night, or use two pilots/ IFR/NVG and TAWS.

One of the boldest solutions to the air medical accident rate will also be the most controversial. Given the nature of air medical, particularly in light of its image Vs reality, hospitals interested in reducing risks, and raising the standard of safety should consider reducing their response radius after a certain time, midnight being the likely cutoff, to a distance of twenty-five miles from the home facility. This restriction would benefit safety in several ways: it would automatically reduce fatigue levels in air med crews; it would be an automatic triage function, putting requesting hospitals and physicians on notice that a patient needing air transport must be flown before midnight, or wait till morning. A reduced operations area would cut the risk of weather-related accidents, putting helicopters closer to the home hospital, thus obviating the aircraft’s use for only emergent patients. Shrinking the response area would also preclude much of the risk associated with weather changes en-route, or due to long wait times at outer hospitals and/or loiter points. Another benefit, particularly at programs with two or more aircraft, is the increased availability for maintenance. It would also save sponsor hospitals money, since the revenue hours flown would likely be less. Plus, the possibility exists that fewer pilots would be needed with a reduced coverage area after midnight.

An alternative to this proposal is the use of IFR cockpits, NVG equipped crews (including medical staff), and adoption of proposed Terrain Awareness & Warning System in all air medical helicopter cockpits per Section 508 of S. 1300*, a bill in the U.S. Senate aimed at rectifying the accident rate in HEMS operations**.

Every program’s statistics are different, and air medical is, after all, an emergency rescue service. But limiting the rescue service would not be the intent; the intent is increased oversight through better triage of transport requests. At most programs, so-called on-scene missions comprise the lowest percentage of response flights. The larger number is stable, non-emergent patient missions. It’s been debated for years whether or not the use of helicopters impacts patient mortality and/or morbidity. That debate will continue. But until the safety issue is adequately addressed, it will override all others. And until safe flight of air medical helicopters becomes a given, advisability of using them for patient transport must be watched more carefully.

The HEMS accident rate will only be reduced when the three legs of the stool are in place: pilots; aircraft & equipment; and hospital/operator oversight. Until the changes listed herein are accepted practice in air medical flying, accidents will continue to plague this critical industry. It’s my hope that all involved can step away from the habits of the past, and focus on the changes needed to make HEMS the safe, efficient patient transport system it can be.

Accidents are not inevitable; they happen when factors conspire against a program and pilots which are relaxed and complacent in regard to safe practices. Helicopter air medical is terribly unforgiving of neglect and incompetence; operators, pilots and their colleagues, and sponsor hospitals must be aggressive in identifying and addressing any and all safety issues immediately, without regard to personnel, political, financial or administrative matters. There’s too much at stake to maintain a cavalier attitude, or assume that an accident can’t happen. Helicopters are flown safely all the time. But it doesn’t happen by accident.

In summary, my recommendations for raising the safety level of air medical helicopters are the following:

*Senate Rule S.1300 is listed.

– For those programs requesting it, an immediate safety stand-down for FAA or other outside party review and report on all aspects of the operation.

– Pilots must be better vetted, and trained emphasizing weather incursion recovery.

– Instrument flight capability for recovery only in all air medical helicopters.

– Higher pilot hours in the aircraft being flown, to include a minimum of 2,000 hours to be hired, 20 hours in type, 10 hours at night, and 50 hours of actual or simulated weather time.

– Multi-engine aircraft in all HEMS operations.

– CVR/FDR/TAWS installation in air med helicopter cockpits + modular installations.

– De-emphasize rapid response/takeoff time.

– Higher program weather minimums, and mandatory down-status.

– Hospital administration must be more involved.

– The contract bottom line must be secondary to safe practices and hard aviation realities. Yearly contracts to expedite innovation time for safety proposals.

– Reduce operating areas at night, or use two pilots.

– Requirement for availability to all medical crews of a no-flight or abandon-mission protocol without fear of repercussion.

– Site manager a hospital employee with authority to hire and fire, with pilot status a plus.

– FAA SFAR for air medical helicopter operations codifying weather minimums, IFR equipment, NVG, TAWS, dual pilot capability, and op specs required for expanded area operations after dark or below specific weather values.

– All air medical flights conducted under part 135 regardless of patient presence.

Equipment Requirements:

Multi-engine aircraft

IFR for recovery only

NVG capability

TAWS

Wire cutters

CVR/FDR

GPS moving map

Weather access in the cockpit in real time

*Legislation, S. 1300, has been introduced in the U.S. Senate to authorize appropriations for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for fiscal years 2008 through 2011 to improve safety and capacity and to modernize the air traffic control system. In addition to the issues previously discussed concerning user fees and surcharges and an increase in the fuel tax, S. 1300 also would mandate significant changes for helicopter emergency medical service operators.

Section 508 of S. 1300 would mandate compliance with Part 135 regulations whenever medical crew are on board, without regard to whether there are patients on board the helicopter. Within 60 days of the date of enactment of S. 1300, the FAA would be required to initiate rulemakings to create standardized checklists of risk evaluation factors and require helicopter EMS operators to use the checklist to determine whether a mission should be accepted. Additionally, the FAA would be required to complete a rulemaking to create standardized flight dispatch procedures for helicopter EMS operators and require operators to use those procedures for flights.

Any helicopter used for EMS operations that is ordered, purchased, or otherwise obtained after the date S. 1300 was enacted would also be required to have on board an operational terrain awareness and warning system (TAWS) that meets the technical specifications of section 135.154 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.R. 135.154).

To improve the data available to National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigators at crash sites, the FAA would also be required to complete a feasibility study of requiring flight data and cockpit voice recorders on new and existing helicopters used to EMS operations. Subsequent to the feasibility study, the FAA would be required within two years of S. 1300’s enactment to complete a rulemaking requiring flight data and cockpit voice recorders on board such helicopters.

All Helicopter Association International (HAI) operators conducting EMS operations are strongly encouraged to review the provisions contained in *Section 508 of S. 1300. HAI is interested in hearing from you with respect to any concerns you might have over the requirements contained in this legislation. Please contact David York or Ann Carroll via email at [email protected] or [email protected].

HAI continues to analyze legislation in the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate with respect to FAA reauthorization and general aviation user fees, surcharges, and other safety provisions. More information will be provided on the HAI Web site as developments occur in Washington.

**Section 508 of S. 1300

S.1300

Aviation Investment and Modernization Act of 2007 (Introduced in Senate)

SEC. 508. INCREASING SAFETY FOR HELICOPTER EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE OPERATORS.

(a) Compliance With 14 CFR Part 135 Regulations- No later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, all helicopter emergency medical service operators shall comply with the regulations in part 135 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations whenever there is a medical crew on board, without regard to whether there are patients on board the helicopter.

(b) IMPLEMENTATION OF FLIGHT RISK EVALUATION PROGRAM- Within 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal Aviation Administration shall initiate, and complete within 18 months, a rulemaking–

(1) to create a standardized checklist of risk evaluation factors based on its Notice 8000.301, issued in August, 2005; and

(2) to require helicopter emergency medical service operators to use the checklist to determine whether a mission should be accepted.

(c) COMPREHENSIVE CONSISTENT FLIGHT DISPATCH PROCEDURES- Within 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal Aviation Administration shall initiate, and complete within 18 months, a rulemaking–

(1) to create standardized flight dispatch procedures for helicopter emergency medical service operators based on the regulations in part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations; and

(2) require such operators to use those procedures for flights.

(d) IMPROVING SITUATIONAL AWARENESS- Any helicopter used for helicopter emergency medical service operations that is ordered, purchased, or otherwise obtained after the date of enactment of this Act shall have on board an operational terrain awareness and warning system that meets the technical specifications of section 135.154 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.R. 135.154).

(e) Improving the Data Available to NTSB Investigators at Crash Sites-

(1) STUDY- Within 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal Aviation Administration shall complete a feasibility study of requiring flight data and cockpit voice recorders on new and existing helicopters used for emergency medical service operations. The study shall address, at a minimum, issues related to survivability, weight, and financial considerations of such a requirement.

RULEMAKING- Within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal Aviation Administration shall complete a rulemaking to require flight data and cockpit voice recorders on board such helicopters.

[ad_2]

Source by Byron Edgington

Categories : DESTINATIONS, EMBRAER, FALCON, GULFSTREAM, HAWKER, JET NEWS, LARGE SIZE BODY JETS, LIGHT SIZE BODY JETS, MEDIUM SIZE BODY JETS, PRIVATE JET AFRICA, PRIVATE JET ASIA, PRIVATE JET AUSTRALIA, PRIVATE JET AVIONICS, PRIVATE JET BUILDER, PRIVATE JET CHARTER, PRIVATE JET CHATER, PRIVATE JET EUROPE, PRIVATE JET MAINTENANCE, PRIVATE JET MIDDLE EAST, PRIVATE JET SOUTH AMERICA, PRIVATE JET TIPS, PRIVATE JET USA, PRIVATE JETS DEALS, TRANSATLANTIC, TRANSPACIFIC
Posted by narrapresley
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments Off on How to Fix the Helicopter EMS Accident Rate
Embraer LEGACY 650E Private Jet Charter EMBRAER LEGACY 650E PRIVATE JET HIRE EMBRAER PRIVATE CHARTER MLKJETS3 1 scaled - Private Air Travel With a Manageable Budget

[ad_1]

When most people hear the phrase, private air travel, the usual image that comes to mind is a jet-setting movie star or CEO, reclining in a leather sofa bed on his Gulfstream Jet 30,000 feet in the air. However, in reality there are tens of thousands of aircraft available for rental throughout the United States on any given day. In this article, we will touch on three different ways that organizations and individuals manage to utilize private air travel without having to be a multi-millionaire.

Hourly Rental

There are many aviation companies as well as private owners who offer their aircraft for private rental. Unlike chartering a jet, a private aircraft rental does not come with a pilot, and certainly not any scantily clad stewardesses. Typically the types of plane rental options that come by the hour involve aircraft such as a Cessna Skyhawk or a Piper Arrow, both of which qualify as small aircrafts.

Not just anybody off the street can go rent a plane though. Qualification requirements include a valid pilot’s license, a valid flight physical (medical check-up), and proof of renters insurance. Additionally, many plane owners require proof of coverage under a non-owned liability insurance policy to protect against the unlikely but very dangerous scenario of an accident.

Aircraft Leasing

For larger aircraft, there are several leasing options that are typically available. The first is known as ACMI, which stands for Aircraft, Crew, Maintenance, and Insurance. Under an ACMI lease, the lessor provides the aircraft, a complete paid crew, and aircraft maintenance and insurance. The lessee has pay for all fuel, landing, handling, parking, and storage fees, as well as visa and duty fees and luggage/passenger insurance as applicable. ACMI lease lengths are usually shorter in length, as the lessee typically guarantees a minimum number of flying hours per month, and is charged accordingly whether or not they use them all. Sometimes an ACMI lease is also known as a wet or damp lease, but the exact differences between each term can vary from country to country.

A dry lease is a lease of a basic airplane without crew, insurance, maintenance or otherwise. The lessee is typically required to register the aircraft in their name, and the length of term is much longer lasting a minimum of two years and sometimes as many as seven or longer. Dry leases are typically used by leasing companies and banks.

Fractional Ownership

The concept of airplane fractional ownership is based around the idea of several owners splitting the purchase price of an airplane, and then paying an additional fee to a third party to handle scheduling, maintenance, and other incidentals. Often times, disputes can arise between owners who both want access to usage of the plane during the same dates, or when the plane is grounded during a requested time due to maintenance issues. Given the higher cost of owning a plane, even on a fractional basis, it is difficult for many of those involved with fractional ownership arrangements to accept that their aircraft is not always immediately available.

So in summary, while private flying will probably never be as readily accessible as commercial flights, you don’t necessarily have to go platinum on your next album or throw four touchdowns in the SuperBowl to gain access to it. Through a growing number of leasing, rental, and fractional ownership programs, more and more Americans are flying private every year.

[ad_2]

Source by Harry Short

Categories : DESTINATIONS, EMBRAER, FALCON, GULFSTREAM, HAWKER, JET NEWS, LARGE SIZE BODY JETS, LIGHT SIZE BODY JETS, MEDIUM SIZE BODY JETS, PRIVATE JET AFRICA, PRIVATE JET ASIA, PRIVATE JET AUSTRALIA, PRIVATE JET AVIONICS, PRIVATE JET BUILDER, PRIVATE JET CHARTER, PRIVATE JET CHATER, PRIVATE JET EUROPE, PRIVATE JET MAINTENANCE, PRIVATE JET MIDDLE EAST, PRIVATE JET SOUTH AMERICA, PRIVATE JET TIPS, PRIVATE JET USA, PRIVATE JETS DEALS, TRANSATLANTIC, TRANSPACIFIC
Posted by narrapresley
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments Off on Private Air Travel With a Manageable Budget
Corporate travel and jet travel solutio for jet corporate charter2 - How Long Does it Take to Wash a Small Cessna Aircraft - Airplane Cleaning 101

[ad_1]

Many folks are still out of work, and the other day when I was in Wichita, KS I did note that the general aviation manufacturing capital of the world was hurting pretty bad still. When discussing this with a local at Starbucks there, he mentioned he’d been laid off for quite some time. It seems that President Obama made some derogatory remarks about CEOs flying around in corporate jets, and literally over night used corporate jet aircraft sales tanked even worse than before, and corporate jet orders just stopped like they hit a brick wall.

We got to talking, mostly hangar talk, airplanes and flying stories, he said he’d like to start an aviation type business but didn’t know what he should do. Since, I’d previously built up a rather nice aircraft cleaning business, he asked; “How Long Does it Take to Wash a Small Cessna Aircraft, or similar plane?”

Good question and my answer was this. For exterior washing, one person with a 5.0 hp pressure washer can clean, remove bugs, clean windscreen, and degrease the belly of a C-152 in about 15-20 minutes if it is washed weekly. A Corvalis a few minutes faster since it is a low wing, but not much faster because it is a four-seater.

For interiors, well it matters if it is a private owner’s plane, or a rental. Interiors for Flight School, Clubs, and FBO aircraft take longer due to the number of flights and people who do not own the aircraft flying it. Private owners quite quickly, as you can use a quick dust buster portable, wipe down the dash, detail out the instrument panel and pump-spray bottle the doors and interior plastic, leather and vinyl.

Indeed, I’d say 5-minutes, a little longer than a car due to the tight quarters and difficulty moving around inside. Add an additional 5-minutes for flight school aircraft, they really get messy, especially as food items get between the seat tracks and things like that.

The big money in cleaning aircraft really is the corporate jet market, but until things drastically improve, I mentioned he’d have a tough go of it. But he could still do well detailing light aircraft, single engine jobs, as not all aircraft owners were in tough times, it really depends on where their money is coming from and the type of business they are in. “Aircraft washing is hard work,” I said “make no mistake about that.” If you are considering starting an aircraft cleaning service, perhaps you will consider all this.

[ad_2]

Source by Lance Winslow

Categories : DESTINATIONS, EMBRAER, FALCON, GULFSTREAM, HAWKER, JET NEWS, LARGE SIZE BODY JETS, LIGHT SIZE BODY JETS, MEDIUM SIZE BODY JETS, PRIVATE JET AFRICA, PRIVATE JET ASIA, PRIVATE JET AUSTRALIA, PRIVATE JET AVIONICS, PRIVATE JET BUILDER, PRIVATE JET CHARTER, PRIVATE JET CHATER, PRIVATE JET EUROPE, PRIVATE JET MAINTENANCE, PRIVATE JET MIDDLE EAST, PRIVATE JET SOUTH AMERICA, PRIVATE JET TIPS, PRIVATE JET USA, PRIVATE JETS DEALS, TRANSATLANTIC, TRANSPACIFIC
Posted by narrapresley
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments Off on How Long Does it Take to Wash a Small Cessna Aircraft – Airplane Cleaning 101
The best destinations of private jet charter for charter a jet on 20203 - Why Celebrities And Millionaires Flock To Wentworth Estate

[ad_1]

The Wentworth Estate is spread out over 1750 acres of area with a wide range of luxury houses and mansions that are valued between £5 million and £50 million.

Over the last decade, a number of millionaires from all over the world are snapping up the properties in the Wentworth Estate and Virginia Water areas of Surrey in England. These tend to range from rich Russian oligarchs to Middle Eastern royalty, from world-renowned sports people to up-and-coming Chinese businessmen. Even former Chilean dictator General Augusto Pinochet lived in the area in the late 1990s.

The article discussed below will tell you more about why celebrities and other millionaires flock to this area.

Strategic Location

The Surrey area is very close to London and Oxford without the hassles of the big city life. It is very close to the major airports, such as Heathrow as well as the small business and executive airport of Farnborough in Hampshire where the rich tend to base their private jets.

It is also very close to major motorways, such as the M3 and the M4.

Most importantly, Surrey offers a lot of other nearby sports amenities from golf to polo.

Safety and Privacy

Safety matters a lot when you are planning to invest a large amount of money in the property market. This is why the gated mansions of the Wentworth Estate are very popular with the rich people.

These rich people also tend to value their privacy a lot too.

Status Symbol

Wentworth Estate will definitely prove to be a great option for you if you are looking to live in a house next to other celebrities and millionaires.

With its world-famous golf course and Virginia Water lake in walking distance, this area of Surrey is very well known across the world as the home of rich and famous. Sir Bruce Forsyth (entertainer and TV presenter), Ernie Els (major winning golfer), Ron Dennis (CEO of very successful F1 team) are some of the very famous residents of the area.

Why should you invest in Wentworth Estate

The Surrey (and especially the Wentworth Estate) property prices are increasing at a much higher rate than the national average. So, buying a property in this area is also a very profitable long term investment as well. Whatever your ambitions and intentions are, the Wentworth Estate is one of the most exclusive and beautiful areas in the world.

[ad_2]

Source by Adil Akkus

Categories : DESTINATIONS, EMBRAER, FALCON, GULFSTREAM, HAWKER, JET NEWS, LARGE SIZE BODY JETS, LIGHT SIZE BODY JETS, MEDIUM SIZE BODY JETS, PRIVATE JET AFRICA, PRIVATE JET ASIA, PRIVATE JET AUSTRALIA, PRIVATE JET AVIONICS, PRIVATE JET BUILDER, PRIVATE JET CHARTER, PRIVATE JET CHATER, PRIVATE JET EUROPE, PRIVATE JET MAINTENANCE, PRIVATE JET MIDDLE EAST, PRIVATE JET SOUTH AMERICA, PRIVATE JET TIPS, PRIVATE JET USA, PRIVATE JETS DEALS, TRANSATLANTIC, TRANSPACIFIC
Posted by narrapresley
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Comments Off on Why Celebrities And Millionaires Flock To Wentworth Estate

Merci de nous contacter pour cette Moto, nous vous répondrons dans les plus brefs delais.

[contact-form-7 id="118" title="Contacter nous Moto Page"]

Merci de nous contacter pour votre devis Moto, nous vous répondrons dans les plus brefs delais.

[contact-form-7 id="5" title="Devis-Pop-up"]
TOP